Foundation Engineering / Technical Guide
Screw piers can provide effective foundation support, but their connections, lateral restraint and interaction with reactive soils matter just as much as their vertical capacity.
Structural engineer Matthew Cornell explains how screw piers work, where problems arise and what engineers should consider when investigating existing house foundations.
What Are Screw Piers?
Screw piers, also called screw piles or helical piers, are steel foundation elements installed by rotating a shaft with one or more helical plates into the ground.
They are commonly used where near-surface soils cannot provide adequate foundation support, or where the design requires loads to be transferred to deeper ground.
In residential construction, screw piers may support house footings, slabs, posts, extensions and other structural elements.
Their main attraction is that they can often be installed relatively quickly with limited excavation and spoil removal compared with conventional bored concrete piers.
However, a screw pier is not a complete foundation system on its own. Its suitability depends on the ground conditions, the loads it must resist, its connection to the structure and the behaviour of the surrounding soil.
Matt’s Main Concern
A screw pier may be capable of carrying its specified vertical load while the overall foundation arrangement remains vulnerable to lateral movement, eccentric loading or differential ground movement.
The whole structural system needs to work, not just the steel pile.
Watch the explanation
Screw Pier Installation and Foundation Problems — Video
In this video, Matthew Cornell discusses screw pier installation, the loads applied to house foundations, the role of pile caps and problems that can arise in reactive soils.
The video includes an installation demonstration credited to Ideal Foundations, followed by Matt’s engineering commentary.
Installation
How Are Screw Piers Installed?
A screw pier generally consists of a steel shaft with one or more helical plates near its lower end.
Installation equipment rotates the pile into the ground. Additional shaft sections can be connected as the pile advances to the required depth.
Depending on the system and ground conditions, the installation torque may be used as part of the process for verifying the pile’s geotechnical capacity. The required torque, depth and acceptance criteria should be established by the responsible designer and pile supplier.
The helix transfers loads into the surrounding ground. Screw piles can be designed for downward compression loads and upward tension loads, subject to the relevant ground conditions and structural design.
Installation records are important. An engineer investigating an existing screw-pier foundation may need to know the pile locations, shaft sizes, helix configurations, installation depths and recorded torques.
Structural behaviour
What Loads Act on Screw Piers?
House foundations do not carry downward loads alone.
Compression
Downward loads from the weight of the house and its imposed loads.
Uplift
Upward forces, including wind actions transferred through the structure and its tie-down system.
Lateral Loads
Sideways forces transferred through posts, bracing and other structural elements.
Moments
Bending effects that can arise from lateral loads, eccentric post reactions and connection arrangements.
A screw pier designed primarily for axial loading should not automatically be assumed capable of resisting significant lateral loads or bending moments.
Those actions may require additional structural elements, an appropriate pile-head connection, greater shaft stiffness or a different foundation arrangement.
Lateral restraint
Why Sideways Support Matters
In the original video, Matt highlights the importance of considering the steel shaft as a structural member, rather than simply assuming that the surrounding ground will prevent it from moving sideways.
Where the upper soils are soft or disturbed, their ability to provide lateral restraint may be limited.
A long, slender steel shaft subjected to compression must be checked for stability and buckling, with realistic assumptions about the restraint provided by the soil.
The lateral resistance of an embedded pile is a geotechnical and structural design question. It depends on factors including soil stiffness, shaft properties, embedment, loading and pile-head restraint.
Matt’s concern is particularly relevant when a screw pier is installed directly beneath a house post without an adequately designed means of transferring lateral forces into the ground.
Important Distinction
Installation may disturb soil around the shaft, but the extent and significance of that disturbance depend on the pile system and ground conditions. It should not be assumed that every screw pier is unsupported along its full embedded length.
Equally, the surrounding soil should not be credited with providing adequate restraint without a defensible design basis.
Connections
What Is a Screw Pile Cap?
A pile cap is a structural element that connects a pile or group of piles to the supported building. It transfers loads between the superstructure and the piles and, where designed to do so, helps distribute forces and resist moments.
For some residential screw-pier arrangements, Matt favours combining the screw pier with a bored concrete footing or pile cap near ground level.
The screw pier can transfer the required axial loads to deeper ground, while the concrete element may be designed to provide additional support, connection capacity and lateral resistance.

This is not a universal detail. The dimensions, reinforcement, embedment, connection and interaction between the concrete footing and the steel pile must be designed for the actual loads and ground conditions.
A shallow concrete cap will not necessarily provide sufficient lateral restraint simply because concrete has been placed around the top of the pile.
Reactive clay
Screw Piers in Reactive Clay Soils
Reactive clay soils expand and contract as their moisture content changes.
In Queensland, this can cause substantial seasonal or longer-term ground movement beneath residential foundations.
Screw piers may be used to transfer foundation loads to deeper, more stable material, but this does not automatically remove the effects of reactive ground movement on the slab or footing system above.
What Happens When the Ground Shrinks?
During drying, reactive soil may shrink away from the underside of a foundation. Compressible fill can also settle, although the causes and implications differ.
If the house is properly supported on deeper piles, a gap may develop between the ground and parts of the suspended or partially supported foundation without the building necessarily settling by the same amount.
However, a visible gap is not enough to establish that the foundation is performing adequately. The load path, pile locations, slab behaviour and reason for the ground movement need to be understood.
What Happens When the Ground Swells?
When reactive soil becomes wetter, it may swell and exert upward pressure on the underside of a slab or footing system.
Deep screw piers may restrain downward settlement at their support points, but they do not necessarily prevent the ground between those points from heaving.
This can create a difficult combination of restrained pile-supported areas and soil-supported areas that move vertically.
The slab and its connections must be designed for the expected behaviour of the entire foundation system.
Waffle slabs
Problems With Screw Piers Beneath Waffle Pod Slabs
Matt’s original discussion raises an important concern about waffle pod slabs supported by screw piers around their perimeter.
If perimeter footings are supported on deeper, relatively stable ground while internal areas of the slab remain influenced by reactive near-surface soils, differential movement can occur.
The internal slab may be subjected to upward heave or loss of support while the perimeter remains restrained.
Adding screw piers to a waffle slab therefore requires consideration of more than the perimeter wall loads.
The designer needs to consider:
- the location and spacing of pile supports;
- the behaviour of internal and perimeter slab beams;
- potential ground shrinkage and swelling;
- the capacity of the slab to span between supports;
- the possibility of uplift acting on the slab;
- the required lateral stability of the foundation system; and
- the intended behaviour of any void formers or movement-isolation details.
A Critical Design Principle
The presence of screw piers does not, by itself, justify designing a slab as though the site’s reactive soil classification were less severe.
Any reduction in design actions or change in foundation assumptions must be supported by the actual engineered system and its expected response to ground movement.
Matt’s preference in the video is to consider internal pile support as well as perimeter support where the foundation arrangement warrants it. Whether that is appropriate depends on the slab design, ground conditions and intended structural behaviour.
Movement details
Can a Pile Cap Allow a Slab to Move?
Some proprietary foundation systems incorporate details intended to accommodate relative movement between a slab and its supporting piles.
Such arrangements may be used where the designer expects reactive soil movement and needs to control how forces are transferred into the pile.
However, movement-isolation details introduce their own design considerations.
The engineer must understand how the connection behaves during upward movement, whether support is maintained or temporarily disengaged, and what happens when the slab returns toward its original position.
Connections, alignment, lateral restraint and the capacity of the slab to bridge between supports all remain important.
These are system-specific questions and cannot be resolved by assuming that an isolation cap automatically protects the building from heave.
Visible foundation movement
Gaps Beneath Houses Supported on Screw Piers
A gap beneath a house slab can develop when the surrounding ground settles or shrinks while the structure remains supported on deeper piles.
This can be alarming to a homeowner, particularly where the gap is visible at the edge of a waffle pod slab.
The appropriate response depends on why the gap formed.
If the soil has consolidated, the movement may differ significantly from seasonal shrinkage of reactive clay, which could reverse when moisture conditions change.
Simply filling a gap beneath a slab without understanding its cause can be problematic. New fill may interfere with an intended movement allowance or transfer unwanted loads into the slab during subsequent soil swelling.
Investigation should establish whether the slab is intended to span between piles, whether the pile supports remain effective and whether the observed movement is consistent with the foundation design.
Construction defects
What Happens When a House Post Misses the Centre of a Screw Pier?
Another issue Matt discusses is a house post positioned away from the intended centreline of its supporting screw pier.
Where a vertical post load is applied eccentrically, it creates a moment in addition to the vertical force.
The magnitude of that moment is related to the load and the offset distance.
If the original design assumed a centrally applied load, the pile cap, pile-head connection and supporting pile may not have been designed for the additional bending effects.
Possible engineering responses depend on the actual geometry and may include:
- checking whether the existing cap and pile can resist the eccentric loading;
- modifying or enlarging the supporting concrete element;
- introducing appropriately designed ground beams to transfer loads to adjacent supports; or
- providing additional support where required.
Matt describes using ground beams to redistribute loads between pile caps where the original post location cannot be achieved.
That approach requires structural design. The beams, adjacent pile reactions, connections and foundations must all be checked for the resulting forces.
Engineering investigations
Common Screw Pier Foundation Problems
When investigating a house supported on screw piers, the relevant question is not simply whether the piles were installed.
It is whether the complete foundation system has been designed, constructed and maintained in a way that adequately supports the building.
Issues that may require investigation include:
- unexplained slab or footing movement;
- cracking associated with differential foundation movement;
- gaps beneath waffle pod slabs;
- uncertainty about pile depths, locations or installation records;
- insufficient or undocumented lateral restraint;
- offset posts and eccentric pile-cap loading;
- damage or movement affecting pile-head connections; and
- foundation behaviour inconsistent with the original design assumptions.
Assessment may involve reviewing the original engineering drawings, geotechnical report, installation records, site levels, photographs and the observed condition of the building.
Where information is missing, further investigation or testing may be necessary before reliable conclusions can be reached.
Independent engineering
Are Screw Piers a Good Foundation System?
They can be. Screw piers offer a practical means of transferring loads to deeper ground and can be particularly useful where conventional shallow footings are unsuitable.
But their effectiveness depends on appropriate engineering and installation.
The pile’s axial capacity, shaft stability, lateral resistance, connections, supporting concrete elements and interaction with the building must be considered together.
For reactive clay sites, the design must also address how the slab or footing system behaves when the surrounding soil shrinks or swells.
Matt’s central point is that specifying screw piers should not become a shortcut around properly designing the rest of the foundation.
Cornell Engineers
Investigating Screw Pier and Foundation Failures
Cornell Engineers specialises in investigating structural problems, foundation movement and building defects.
We provide independent assessments of suitable complex matters involving screw-pier-supported structures, slab movement, cracking, suspected construction defects and disputed causes of damage.
Our role is to investigate the available evidence, explain the likely causes and provide clear recommendations for further investigation or rectification.
Related reading: What Is Underpinning? and our Industrial Structures services.
Engineering enquiries
Concerned About a Screw Pier Foundation?
If a building supported on screw piers has developed cracking, movement or other structural concerns, provide us with the location, photographs and any available foundation drawings or reports.
We will review the information and advise whether the matter is suitable for an independent engineering investigation.

13 replies on “Screw piers, Pile caps and Houses”
Hi Matthew,
Very informative indeed. I have seen builders cutting the screw piles a bit lower than the platform surface level to allow them to lay the sand bed and achieve a uniform platform to lay the polythene and the waffle pods. This leaves a thin sand layer of 10-25mm between the screw pile capping plate and the underside of the waffle slab ribs/edge beams. Is this something to be concerned about?
Good job Matt ! I was so so struggling with a University assignment until I stumbled across your very informative lecture.
Bless You mate !
Thanks heaps !
🙂
Thanks Matthew for the great lecture on Screw Piles, much appreciated! I would like to ask you a question about an alternative pile implementations that seems to be gaining popularity. It has an end bit that looks like a timber screw i.e. instead of a Helix shape there is thread that tapers off into a point. I guess the screw shape causes very little soft soil around the core of the pile itself in contrast to the Helix shaped pile. However, the up and down forces are dealt with by the pitch of the thread rather than the blades of a Helix. I am planning to build a small timber home (80 m2) and wonder if this Screw version could compete with the Helix version in terms of up/down/lateral forces? Do you have any thoughts perhaps? Many thanks! Best regards, -Rene
Hi Matt,
An apparently common practice is to not use a proprietary metal plate pier cap, or pour a concrete cap, separately prior to pouring the slab.
So a hole is cut in the vapour membrane that the pipe protrudes through and the slab is poured. The top of the pipe is therefore encase in concrete as part of the slab.
There seems to be a number of issues with this practice. There are large openings in the vapour membrane. There is steel in the slab that is not encased by the required 50mm minimum of concrete as it protrudes out into the soil or sand.
This would seem to set up a situation where steel open to the environment protrudes up into the slab and will rust. I imagine this rusting would be an even greater problem in saline coastal soils and beach sand that these piers are often used in. Wouldn’t this then increase the likelihood of cracking?
I have also seen pier tops being either left uncovered or capped with fence post caps. These caps are slightly domed so they seem completely inappropriate if the main role of the cap is bearing downward forces.
Thanks Matt for the explanation..
How do you calculate the torque ( which is in the horizontal plane direction) to be applied in order to achieve the screw pile capacity ( which is in the vertical direction )
Hi Tan Chin Shu
I believe the correlation between shaft torque and allowable bearing capacity has to be determined from on=site testing using the screw pile you intend using. Check out Katana’s website for more information. https://katanafoundations.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Katana-Screw-Pile-Brochure-2020.pdf
Matt Cornell
It is very good education video. Love it. Question, is it possible to have M-class waffle pod foundation with 1.7m high drop edge beam at the 15 degrees slope site? 1.5m Deep fill. I am about to build a new house. My Geotech said it should be classified as P class instead of M class. Even the soil is M class, building at sloping block with deep fill should be engineered properly to P class. Is it correct?
Thank you very much Matt.
Your explanation of these piers has been very helpful and informative.
Thank you Jodi. My pleasure.
Very informative I can now make some changes to the foundation design my builder was talking me into
I have concerns that torque is not a good determination of soil bearing capacity at base of pier which is the technical decider on depth needed.Reason being is the same reason torque is a poor decider of clamp strength in structural bolt applications and in that case load bearing washers are used to determine clamp strength (pretension) of bolt. Too much torque force is taken up with screw surface friction and l believe the same with this method. As l was once Metallurgist for a bolt manufacturing company l have awareness of the bolt side but not the screw pier side so l wonder if and how you account for this.
Hi Ian
Your concern is not unfounded. I’ll leave it to the screw pier designers to answer (if any screwpierd designers would like to respond?).
Matt
I’m glad you helped me to understand that a screw pier is a pole with a helix on it that is inserted into the ground. I would imagine that this helps make structures be more resistant to earthquakes. It seems the less a structure moves during an earthquake, the less amount of damage it will receive.